• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • File a Report
  • Check Report
  • Client Login

Red Flag Reporting

Protecting Organizations & Their People

  • Home
  • About RFR
    • Our Team and Expertise
    • Who Do We Help?
    • Published Articles
  • Services
    • Hotline Service
    • Compliance Services
  • Benefits
    • Protect Employees
    • Protect Your Reputation
    • Protect Your Bottom Line
    • Manage Cases with Ease
  • Blog
  • Get Started
    • FAQ
    • Request a Demo or Quote
  • Contact Us

July 11, 2016

Toxic Substances Facing New Scrutiny

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act was signed into law on June 22, 2016 by President Obama, which amended the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for the first time since 1976.  After years of inconsistent regulations, these new amendments change how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates and administers TSCA while providing manufactures greater consistency to implement law.

The new TSCA requires EPA to reset and update its entire chemical inventory within one year of the bill’s passage into law. Included are all chemicals in US commerce, including any which are high priority in terms of presenting an unreasonable risk to human health. Although TSCA originally granted EPA such authorization, there was no mandate to implement procedure. The newest TSCA does provide clear structure for EPA to assess all commercial chemicals. Companies should be aware which chemicals are deemed high priority and be prepared to disclose all chemical substances along their supply chains to EPA.

In addition to EPA’s current tools requiring testing in conjunction with consent agreements, TSCA is also now able to order testing for chemical assessments unilaterally. In addition, EPA must include a justifying statement of an order instead of a consent agreement to require testing.

EPA is now required, per TSCA, to determine which chemicals pose an unreasonable health or environmental risk without consideration of costs or benefits while still considering impact on vulnerable populations.

While determining which chemicals pose unreasonable risk via risk evaluations, not all chemicals inventoried by EPA are subject.  Determining which chemicals are high priority or low priority will be through a screening process to be developed within a year of passing the law. The priority ranking of a chemical will engage an evaluation deadline relative to the level of risk.

Companies may be ordered to conduct risk evaluations and TSCA amendments have few limits on frequency and scope; this may incur additional costs and administrative functions during the evaluation process.

If a chemical is identified to pose unreasonable risk, EPA must regulate it. Those regulations are limited to the scope of the risk evaluation and must account for economic impact. That impact includes effects on small business, national economy, technological innovations, and environmental and public health.

The highlight of TSCA reform is strengthening federal preemption. While EPA concludes whether a chemical presents unreasonable risk as high priority, a state is preempted from issuing a law on the substance. This “high priority pause” ends after EPA’s assessment and then states are prone to EPA’s findings.  The pause prevents multiple states regulating a single chemical in conflicting ways while manufacturers wait additional regulation.

Looking for a safety hotline service provider?  We can help!

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet

Filed Under: Health Hazards, Workplace Safety

We are Red Flag Reporting

We offer ethics, safety and fraud hotline / case management solutions to our clients via the web, over the phone and through other methods. Trusted by organizations large and small in 50 countries, we can help you!

We are an Ethics Hotline Service Provider
Find Out More  Get a Quote

Primary Sidebar

Hotline and Web Portal

We are an Ethics Hotline Service Provider

Get a Quote

We offer ethics, safety and fraud hotline / case management solutions to our clients via the web, over the phone and through other methods. Trusted by organizations large and small in 50 countries, we can help you!

OSHA Publishes Interim Final Rule for Addressing Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Complaints

The interim final rule, which became effective on …

[Read Article...] about OSHA Publishes Interim Final Rule for Addressing Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Complaints

Mastering the Zoom Apology

Note: This article is provided by fellow Akros …

[Read Article...] about Mastering the Zoom Apology

Watch Out for AI-Assisted Fraud

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a type of …

[Read Article...] about Watch Out for AI-Assisted Fraud

Footer

Follow Along

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Red Flag Reporting

Red Flag Reporting provides compliance and ethics hotline services and case management software solutions to organizations seeking to promote safe and ethical behavior.

Reach Us

Red Flag Reporting
P.O. Box 4230, Akron, Ohio 44321
Contact Us

(Sales Office only – not a reporting line)
Tel: 877-676-6551
Fax: 330-572-8146

NOTE: Red Flag Reporting services are available for purchase by organizations only. We do not sell or provide our services to individual people.

  

 

Copyright © 2023 Red Flag Reporting all rights reserved. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective holders.

  • Red Flag Reporting – Ethics, Fraud and Whistleblower Hotline Service
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy