• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • File a Report
  • Check Report
  • Client Login

Red Flag Reporting

Protecting Organizations & Their People

  • Home
  • About RFR
    • Our Team and Expertise
    • Who Do We Help?
    • Published Articles
  • Services
    • Hotline Service
    • Compliance Services
  • Benefits
    • Protect Employees
    • Protect Your Reputation
    • Protect Your Bottom Line
    • Manage Cases with Ease
  • Blog
  • Get Started
    • FAQ
    • Request a Demo or Quote
  • Contact Us

April 13, 2017

McLane Co. Inc. vs. the EEOC: Wider Latitude for Governmental Agencies?

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet

I just came across Judy Greenwald’s recent article in BusinessInsurance.com. “Supreme Court subpoena ruling favors EEOC,” details the 7 – 1 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in sex discrimination charge following an investigation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.  It is notable for a few reasons, particularly the potential latitude it affords the EEOC.

Upon returning from maternity leave to Temple, a Texas-based grocery and food chain of McLane Co., Damiana Ochoa was fired after failing to pass a physical strength test.  Ochoa filed a charge in 2008 with the EEOC, alleging passing the test was a condition to return to work.

Upon launching nationwide investigation of all McLane facilities, the EEOC discovered despite providing certain information about who was required to take the test, McLane did not comply with an administrative subpoena asking for “pedigree information,” such as each test taker’s name, social security number, last known address, and phone number.

Greenwald goes on to report this prompted the EEOC to file a subpoena enforcement action.  In response, the U.S. District Court in Phoenix ruled McLane should disclose a test-taker’s gender, but refused to order the company to divulge pedigree information or reasons for termination following the test.  In October 2015, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco unanimously deemed pedigree information relevant to the EEOC investigation and that McLane should provide it.

“First, the longstanding practice of the Courts of Appeals in reviewing a district court’s decision to enforce or quash an administrative subpoena is to review that decision for abuse of discretion,” Greenwald reports the majority ruling said. An abuse of discretion was found by the panel, a decision endorsed by the Supreme Court.  One expert characterized the ruling a victory for the EEOC.

Gerald L. Maatman Jr., a partner with Seyfarth Shaw LLP in Chicago, is quoted in Greenwald’s article that the case law in most circuit courts gives the EEOC a “very wide latitude on the information it deems necessary to investigate EEOC charges.”

With safeguards and proactive options for employees in place, organizations are better able to address employee concerns before a situation escalates to lengthy and costly litigation; one such resource is a hotline.

Red Flag Reporting’s mission is to provide a simple yet highly effective ethics hotline, safety hotline, fraud hotline and whistleblower hotline.  Red Flag Reporting helps protect your organization’s employees, goodwill, and bottom-line.

Looking for an employee hotline service provider?  We can help!

Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet

Filed Under: Discrimination, Employee Hotline, Ethics

We are Red Flag Reporting

We offer ethics, safety and fraud hotline / case management solutions to our clients via the web, over the phone and through other methods. Trusted by organizations large and small in 50 countries, we can help you!

We are an Ethics Hotline Service Provider
Find Out More  Get a Quote

Primary Sidebar

Hotline and Web Portal

We are an Ethics Hotline Service Provider

Get a Quote

We offer ethics, safety and fraud hotline / case management solutions to our clients via the web, over the phone and through other methods. Trusted by organizations large and small in 50 countries, we can help you!

With DEI and Privacy Considerations, What Can You Have on an Employment Application?

Guest Author: Tim Dimoff of SACS Consulting and …

[Read Article...] about With DEI and Privacy Considerations, What Can You Have on an Employment Application?

Harassment Does not Disappear in the Remote Workplace. Here’s What You Need to Know.

Even as COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted, …

[Read Article...] about Harassment Does not Disappear in the Remote Workplace. Here’s What You Need to Know.

OSHA Clarifies Travel Injury Recording Requirements

In January of 2022, the Occupational Safety and …

[Read Article...] about OSHA Clarifies Travel Injury Recording Requirements

Footer

Follow Along

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Red Flag Reporting

Red Flag Reporting provides compliance and ethics hotline services and case management software solutions to organizations seeking to promote safe and ethical behavior.

Reach Us

Red Flag Reporting
P.O. Box 4230, Akron, Ohio 44321
Contact Us

(Sales Office only – not a reporting line)
Tel: 877-676-6551
Fax: 330-572-8146

NOTE: Red Flag Reporting services are available for purchase by organizations only. We do not sell or provide our services to individual people.

  

 

Copyright © 2022 Red Flag Reporting all rights reserved. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective holders.

  • Red Flag Reporting – Ethics, Fraud and Whistleblower Hotline Service
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy