We came across the article, “Employee’s Request for Leave Triggered ADA Accommodation Obligations,” by Johnathan M. Crotty, on parkerpoe.com. This article discusses the lawsuit, Garrison v. Dolgencorp, LLC, in which the plaintiff sued her employer under the ADA and FMLA. The plaintiff had requested a leave of absence due to migraines and depression, but her manager stated that he didn’t believe that she qualified under the law. He did not properly handle her request, and instead left her no choice but to either work or quit to take care of herself.

The plaintiff believed that her employer failed to comply with the ADA and FMLA. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that the plaintiffs right for a leave of absence was covered by the ADA. On the other hand, it was determined that she did not qualify for FMLA leave because she had failed to follow proper documentation procedures laid out by her employer.

Garrison v. Dolgencorp, LLC, serves as a reminder to familiarize yourself with laws that protect employees with disabilities. Although the plaintiff was fairly denied leave under FMLA, she was still covered by the ADA. It is clear that employers must reference both acts before denying a leave of absence for employers who are sick or disabled. Failure to properly analyze each request may result in litigation.

Employers can limit their risk for litigation by defining clear procedures for requesting and processing leaves of absence. People at all levels of the organization should be familiar with both processes as well as their rights under ADA and FMLA. When employees’ believe that their rights are being violated, there should be a clear process for reporting concerns. The use of an ethics hotline and case management system can ensure that employees are heard and that their concerns are properly and efficiently addressed internally.

Get a Quote or a Demo.

We are responsive, friendly, and easy to work with.

Reach Us

Red Flag Reporting
P.O. Box 4230, Akron, Ohio 44321

Tel: 877-676-6551
Fax: 330-572-8146

Follow Us:

Share This Blog!

Related Posts

  • Illustration of a hand supporting a balanced scale with a person on one side and documents on the other, symbolizing the human side of compliance.

    February 16, 2026

    The Human Side of Compliance: Stories Behind the Calls

  • A photo-realistic image of a professional boardroom setting with a dark wood table. In the foreground, a clipboard holds a document clearly titled "Anti-Retaliation Policy." Next to the document is a small placard that reads "YOUR RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED." In the center of the table, a set of silver scales of justice is enclosed within a protective glass cloche, symbolizing the shielded nature of workplace fairness. This visual provides a professional context for the question: what is an anti-retaliation policy?

    February 3, 2026

    What is an Anti-Retaliation Policy? Definition, Examples, and Best Practices

  • A conceptual digital illustration of a modern city at sunset, encased within a glowing blue holographic dome representing transparency and protection. In the foreground, a large holographic eye containing a telephone icon symbolizes the "vision" provided by hotlines for proactive crisis mitigation. Floating labels within the digital interface include phrases like "First Echoes" and "Early Warning," while the word "HOTLINES" is prominently displayed in bold, illuminated lettering. Data lines connect the central icon to the surrounding skyscrapers, illustrating how early detection ensures organizational integrity.

    January 13, 2026

    Proactive Crisis Mitigation: Using Hotlines as Early Warning Systems